Powered by vBulletin

(opinion)Next best lmg...............

Printable View

  • 08-17-2013, 08:26 PM
    King piccolo
    (opinion)Next best lmg...............
    The thunder will definitely be the next best gun. with a stock 14 fire rate and a 120 mag it easily beats out other lmgs and almost if not all ar. if you guys see another gun thats better do tell. thanks
  • 08-17-2013, 08:54 PM
    do_you_even_lift
    thunder will deal 2800 dps and saw will deal 2400 dps but a full clip of the thunder does 24000 dmg if every bullet hits the saw will do 25500 dmg if every bullet hits. the better lmg is going to be the lmg with the best accuracy ive never used a thunder but my saw is very accurate can anyone tell me if the thunder is more accurate?
  • 08-17-2013, 08:57 PM
    FDG SKULLS
    it really depends on what each gun has on it if they have -accuracy for both then i would say the thunder because it has no recoil but again the saw is a little bit more accurate but with the thunder having no recoil its diffidently the better choice
  • 08-17-2013, 09:20 PM
    King piccolo
    the natural recoil on thunder is about .18 recoil

    saw is about.80
  • 08-17-2013, 09:26 PM
    Nefarious
    You do realize the Thunder's cross hairs take a moment to tighten up as you fire it. Where as other guns like AR are Aim and shoot.
  • 08-17-2013, 09:28 PM
    King piccolo
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Nefarious View Post
    You do realize the Thunder's cross hairs take a moment to tighten up as you fire it. Where as other guns like AR are Aim and shoot.

    im not understanding how this is relevant
  • 08-17-2013, 09:37 PM
    L Y
    I know its not exactly what you asked but I enjoy using Rockers.
  • 08-17-2013, 09:41 PM
    Nefarious
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by King piccolo View Post
    im not understanding how this is relevant

    It effects the weapons mobility...Doesn't matter what the stats say. If you need to stand still with it to maintain fire then I wouldint consider it "definitely be the next best gun" as you put it.

    For sure it has fire power. But its good at what IT does. Not the over all best.
  • 08-17-2013, 10:11 PM
    Dracian
    Don't worry, after testing it in the Alpha Server, I can tell you that the SAW is still a beast weapon.
  • 08-17-2013, 10:41 PM
    King piccolo
    but better than a 14 fire rate and 120 mag stock thunder?
  • 08-18-2013, 12:59 AM
    FearDaBeard
    The thunder will be good for sustained and accurate fire. It will still deal a lowish 200 DMG per bullet, but its accuracy and increased fire rate should increase its lethality. Hip fire and crit damage will still be terrible.
  • 08-18-2013, 02:40 AM
    DarknessEyes PT
    Do the math!
    VBI LM-43 Thunder (LMG):
    200 dmg x 14 fire rate = 2800 damage per second.
    14 fire rate * 5 seconds / 120 mag = 0,583 seconds to reload 14 bullets.
    60 secs * 2800 dmg / (0,583 + 1) = 106.128 (non critical) to 106.128 (critical) damage per minute .

    VBI Assault Rifle (Assault Rifle):
    222 dmg x 12 fire rate = 2664 damage per second.
    12 fire rate * 2.5 seconds / 45 mag = 0,666 seconds to reload 12 bullets.
    60 secs * 2664 dmg / (0,666 + 1) = 95.942 (non critical) to 143.913 (critical) damage per minute .

    FRC Saw (LMG):
    300 dmg x 8 fire rate = 2400 damage per second.
    8 fire rate * 4.5 seconds / 85 mag = 0.424 seconds to reload 8 bullets.
    60 secs * 2400 dmg / (0.424 + 1) = 101.124 (non critical) to 151.686 (critical) damage per minute.

    An human head is around 13.33% of human body, lets calculate if 13.33% of bullets hit the head and 86.66% of bullets hit the body:

    * VBI LM-43 Thunder: 91.971 (non critical) + 14.147 (critical) = 106.118 damage per minute.
    * VBI Assault Rifle: 83.143 (non critical) + 19.184 (critical) = 102.327 damage per minute.
    * FRC Saw: 87.634 (non critical) + 20.220 (critical) = 107.854 damage per minute.
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:59 PM.
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.3
Copyright © 2021 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.