Defiance Review

Picture of cerberus at arkfall? how?

Well this wasn't a completely pandering, disingenuous and barely articulate piece at all.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DaMaJaDiZ

Well this wasn't a completely pandering, disingenuous and barely articulate piece at all.

---

umm what they said (mumbles) how dare they use all them new fangled engalish wurds

I hope to a non-existent Christ that you don't make money from this bile regurgitation of a review.

The funniest thing is that on page 2 of the review you pretty much say that the entire game, other than the co-op and controls, is garbage. Turn to page 3 and you reveal a 8/10 score... The final score seems predetermined or random.

Quote:

---

. It feels like you are firing rubber ammunition and the same is for the explosives. There are many different weapons that shoot rockets or grenades, but you don’t really get the feeling that you are using a powerful rocket. Puff! they explode and doesn’t even cause a knock back effect to the enemies.

---

Quote:

---

for me doing the same thing over and over get really boring really fast. The missions here are an excellent example of that. If you could sum up the main and side missions in the game in one sentence it would be “Kill, kill, kill then hold X or Square (or whatever the PC button is) till you complete the objective.” This is the ugly truth behind the mission design in Defiance.

---

Quote:

---

Also I wish they tone down the boring instances, I don’t want to rescue the same farmer again and again

---

Quote:

---

. The competitive part of Defiance, the PVP side, yeah you can skip it and not miss a thing. It’s a cluster-f*ck of rockets, grenades and lame cloaking shotgun insta-kill players. It’s frustrating and can get on your nerves pretty quickly. There is also a Shadow War mode, think Call of Duty Domination or Battlefield Conquest, that can be fun to play when there is one going on. Waiting a full day for the lobby to fill up with 64 players for the match to start isn’t the way to go, the devs need to find another way.

---

It's not that I disagree with you, it's that you're making valid points and basically saying that 80% of the game is crap... However you score it as if 80% of the game is complete gold.

EDIT: Also, hire a proofreader.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by K1LLSVV1TCH

I hope to a non-existent Christ that you don't make money from this bile regurgitation of a review.

The funniest thing is that on page 2 of the review you pretty much say that the entire game, other than the co-op and controls, is garbage. Turn to page 3 and you reveal a 8/10 score... The final score seems predetermined or random.










It's not that I disagree with you, it's that you're making valid points and basically saying that 80% of the game is crap... However you score it as if 80% of the game is complete gold.

EDIT: Also, hire a proofreader.

---

Thank you for snipping some of that for me. I didn't want to click the link but so many reactions cracked me up and now I know has why things has shot me funny laugh time.

(This is why you don't post poorly written reviews)

-It's like English met Engrish had the most special ed kid ever born, got him/her drunk, forced ten pounds of paint down their throats and then said "go right a review".

-It's like IGN and Gamespot hired the I has cheeseburger cat for a spot review.

-It's like all of thailand decided to get online and start typing in english until this review was born.

- It's like aids and cancer took on the form of words.

I could keep going on but my kind criticism will be met with harsh swift pony striking grenade shooting no knockback go boom.