
Originally Posted by
PseudoCool
As someone who's been a forum moderator before, I can tell you this from experience: While the initial knee jerk reaction to this type of rule in the CoC is one of shock or backlash, the reality is having threads that actually HAVE a title is a lot better than one that doesn't. THis helps moderators know what's in the thread before they start reading it. It does NOT mean that mod's or "Director of Community" get to start ignoring threads, they still have to pour over them and make sure the CoC is being followed in each post.
Knowing what your getting into with a post is a bit nicer for them than having the "Whoa.. here's a thread marked "Thanks Trion!" that just slapped us all across the face!".
Just remember Ms. Dahanese.. This is America.. sure.. we can play nice and keep the labels up to make your day easier, but watch that slope your on. Not only is the removal of free speech against our great Constitution (even on private property, digital or physical.. for all you internet sea lawyers out there) but your moderators already, and quite liberally I may add, dole out punishments in a very haphazard and disorganized fashion. Let's make sure that as you make rapid and unforeseen changes to the CoC that those people who must dispense the warnings, are doing so fairly and within sound judgement. From what I've seen, they have no clue what fair and sound judgement is, so giving them more rules to enforce probably isn't the best idea.
I'll play nice and make sure my posts adhere to this ruling, that's my part. Perhaps it will encourage someone to do their's and actually provide some guidance to moderators on enforcing the CoC with some sound judgement. From what I've seen in the last week.. I won't be holding my breath.