I agree with this sentiment, but also believe I understand the upset...
Context.
It's one thing to re-hash the rules.
It's another thing to re-hash the rules after a certain member of the community management team makes a post that flubs a large portion of the community and causes even the mildest posters to turn negative.
And it's a completely different matter to re-hash the rules after such an event... and not admit the reason is because the community management team may have been harsh/hasty in such event.
In other words, there's two ways to take this: "That was our bad, but the rules haven't changed."
Or "We're cracking down on the rules, don't like it then get banned."
Without any implication of fault or apology on the part of the community management, it's easy to lean towards the other option.
PS: I will simply state that I currently have no reason to be upset or enraged at these "changes". That may or may not change, but, for the moment, it is what it is.



Reply With Quote
