+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
  1. #1

    Which scope for an frc heavy carbine?

    I hate the scope on the frc heavy carbine. Since you can't remove it, which scope changes the graphic and offers the same or less magnification?

    Save me some real time and fake money.

  2. #2
    Member Cavadus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    MN, U.S.A.
    Posts
    1,735
    Stabilization Sight.

  3. #3
    Member Arsenic_Touch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    5,881
    Commando is the one you want. It gives you medium zoom, but has more surface area so you can see more compared to the higher zoom scope. The assault scope and the stabilization scope don't even add a scope.

    Is it better to out-monster the monster or to be quietly devoured?
    ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
    Beta Tester -/- NA PC Player -/- CORE Leader -/- Ego Level 5,xxx - Clan Level 3,100 - Winterborn - Now playing ESO & Firefall

  4. #4
    Stabilization sight doesn't add aim accuracy and it doesn't remove the scope does it?

    I tried a white assault scope and there was no visual change. I assumed the stabilization scope was the same.

  5. #5
    Sounds like commando is what I'm looking for. I don't normally use heavies and I usually use stabilization on my other ARs.

  6. #6
    Member Arsenic_Touch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    5,881

    Commando

    vs


    Tactical

    As you can see, the commando scope will serve you much better on a heavy assault carbine.

    Is it better to out-monster the monster or to be quietly devoured?
    ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
    Beta Tester -/- NA PC Player -/- CORE Leader -/- Ego Level 5,xxx - Clan Level 3,100 - Winterborn - Now playing ESO & Firefall

  7. #7

  8. #8
    Member Cavadus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    MN, U.S.A.
    Posts
    1,735
    Quote Originally Posted by BlackNinjaFF View Post
    Stabilization sight doesn't add aim accuracy and it doesn't remove the scope does it?
    It removes the scope and while it doesn't add aim accuracy it does add regular accuracy plus movement accuracy. HACs need movement accuracy very badly and, as it turns out, they're pretty crap at range due to falloff killing their damage by ~70% from 55 to 63 meters. If you want range grab a TACC because they have zero falloff.

  9. #9
    Member Arsenic_Touch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    5,881
    Quote Originally Posted by Cavadus View Post
    It removes the scope and while it doesn't add aim accuracy it does add regular accuracy plus movement accuracy. HACs need movement accuracy very badly and, as it turns out, they're pretty crap at range due to falloff killing their damage by ~70% from 55 to 63 meters. If you want range grab a TACC because they have zero falloff.
    Stabilization scope does not remove the scope. It doesn't add a scope, there's a difference.

    Is it better to out-monster the monster or to be quietly devoured?
    ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
    Beta Tester -/- NA PC Player -/- CORE Leader -/- Ego Level 5,xxx - Clan Level 3,100 - Winterborn - Now playing ESO & Firefall

  10. #10
    Member Cavadus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    MN, U.S.A.
    Posts
    1,735
    Doesn't the stab sight turn everything into a zoomed-in third-person view? The last thing I remember installing it on was an LM-43 but that doesn't have a scope to begin with.

    Since switching to SASRs I stopped using HACs.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts