Page 34 of 41 FirstFirst ... 24 32 33 34 35 36 ... LastLast
Results 331 to 340 of 408

Thread: SweetFX

  1. #331
    Quote Originally Posted by Myrken View Post
    Glad i could help someone today lol! Now I'm going crawl to my bed and pass out and eat a pillow lol.
    I would just like to share this with everyone in this thread, I feel this is progress.

    Myrken, you have been a great help with getting Sweetfx running and also providing some damn good presets.





    Well, they have seen the thread and it hasn't been deleted, i'll keep you guys informed.

  2. #332
    Member Arsenic_Touch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    5,881
    Would make no sense to move the thread if it wasn't acceptable, unless the moderators make a habit of moving stuff without reading what it's about?

    Wish sledge would just make an official post about it. If they are going to ban people over it, they need to step up and put these settings in game with a slider.

    Is it better to out-monster the monster or to be quietly devoured?
    ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
    Beta Tester -/- NA PC Player -/- CORE Leader -/- Ego Level 5,xxx - Clan Level 3,100 - Winterborn - Now playing ESO & Firefall

  3. #333
    they can't said "we approve it" because of legal issues, but they can say it's forbidden and they didn't said it

  4. #334
    Member Noupoi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    68
    Huh, the 7 page discussion thread about the use of SweetFX possibly leading to a ban has somehow vanished from the forums. Have we had any official word about it since?
    Come join the Lockbox Data collection Project!
    Official Thread|Submit results!|View collected data!

  5. #335
    Senior Member Amonkira's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    europe
    Posts
    359
    Quote Originally Posted by Noupoi View Post
    Huh, the 7 page discussion thread about the use of SweetFX possibly leading to a ban has somehow vanished from the forums. Have we had any official word about it since?
    Shhh...Big Brother is watching...careful of what your saying...NOOOOOO DISASSEMBLE!
    Bunnyjumpers killed with headshot since day 1: 305

    Loadout:

    Main: Frontline Repeater with 1.15% native crit multi - crit multi barrel - nano effect mag - recoil/bloom stock.

    Backup: FRC Assault Carbine with 1.15% native crit multi - aim/hip dmg barrel - nano effect mag - recoil/bloom stock.



  6. #336
    Senior Member MacDeath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    2,126
    Quote Originally Posted by Noupoi View Post
    Huh, the 7 page discussion thread about the use of SweetFX possibly leading to a ban has somehow vanished from the forums. Have we had any official word about it since?
    Discussing bans on the forums is against the CoC. THAT'S probably why that thread was removed. NOT because it was about SweetFX? This thread we are in right now is about SweetFX and hasn't been closed or removed.
    Mac - VBI Operative Proud Member of the Friends of Trick Dempsey Association

    The few, the proud, the DEFIANT!

  7. #337
    Senior Member Myrken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    151
    This is good news indeed I'm happy with it as the new location matches the purpose of the thread, and will help assist those who need the assistance.
    http://forums.defiance.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=1944939&dateline=1364  751418
    "On a long enough timeline the survival rate for everyone drops to zero"

  8. #338
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1
    Careful now, a Guildmate "Got a 24hr ban for using a 3rd party program giving an unfair advantage." The only thing he was using was SweetFX 8-(

  9. #339
    Senior Member Myrken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    151
    Well it doesn't give unfair advantage so something else might have been responsible for that ban. As was the case with myself from experience. Remember they can scan all actively running processes when playing Defiance, and even if you use a tool like cheat engine for something like skyrim and have defiance minimized it could account for a ban. So we will see they would have removed this thread if they had intent to ban people for it and not moved it to tech support.Thank you for the information Snuffsaid we will see. This move to a new location is a big step up for them to then start banning people over it wouldn't make sense. Also as of now only 2 people that i know of have had bans using sweetfx and mine personally rules out sweetfx, so that just leaves your guildmate i know of out of the thousands using it in game already. Gives me the feeling something else was going on in that case maybe as well.

    Time will tell threads still up and now in a better location to help people so things are looking up.
    http://forums.defiance.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=1944939&dateline=1364  751418
    "On a long enough timeline the survival rate for everyone drops to zero"

  10. #340
    Frankly I don't believe reports from strangers.


    a) It is human nature trying to appear better than how we really are. There might have been another tool involved, there might not have been. We do not know, and we cannot go back in time and to your guild mate's place to check for ourselves.

    b) It appears Trion isn't giving much info when suspending or banning accounts, so we do not know the real reason why they deemed it necessary to do so.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts