Will Trion implement a "Head Start" option?

[Desidus]

Why do we need a headstart? I think Trion should just delay opening up the servers and make everyone start at the same time... SEE THE MADNESS BEGIN! BA HA HA HA HA HA!

[Banefire]

I remember back when wow first released.... Soooo many people took forever for respawn times for starter quests. Curious how mission target respawns will work. I know they have the large area of influence for people who want to jump in an help out but since only four can party at a time... What if two seperate parties kill same target for same mission....

[Cyrox]

I remember back when wow first released.... Soooo many people took forever for respawn times for starter quests. Curious how mission target respawns will work. I know they have the large area of influence for people who want to jump in an help out but since only four can party at a time... What if two seperate parties kill same target for same mission....

In this game you don't have to tag enemies, every quest is "shared" so you can work towards quest goal with everyone in the area. For example you have to clear out a camp you don't even have to do anything if others around you do it while you are next to them.

[Banefire]

That would be outstanding. Nothing was more annoying then trying to accomplish a mission or task and people kept beating you too it.

[Pasha]

Could be nice. But against common sense:

who else can launch the game on 1st second after server start but the person who purchased (pre-ordered) game before that second?

[Ambic]

If everyone is fighting over arkfalls and stuff massively in the starting areas, it's going to make a lot of people mad and will probably lose players over this. Congestion is not good. Too high a population is bad and too low a population is bad. There has to be some midway. A headstart would definitely help ease that starting zone tension. Players can't really "learn" the game when they have to wait hours to complete a single mission.