+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23
  1. #11
    Member Belle Starr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Emerald Coast, United States of America
    Posts
    1,475

    Just Saying, NP!

    I'm just saying, a lot of people like the way PVP allows group play, so they can team with their friends and clan mates, and help the new players get their pursuits! As Mrdr said, multiplayer is part of MMO, so it should promote the multiplayer cooperative aspect of the game, not just individual players murdering each other one by one in PVP!

    There is a saying in my country: If it's not broke, don't fix it! In this instance I don't see that PVP is broken when it comes to allowing grouping to promote group play!

    If you want to play PVP in Defiance and have an 24/7 active clan, than I don't see why you don't just group with them when you play PVP, all things being equal! NP then! If you want to play one-on-one, then there are other games for that, or the Duel PVP in this one!

    All the world's a stage, and all the men and women merely players: they have their exits and their entrances; and one man in his time plays many parts, his acts being seven ages.

    William Shakespeare


    Belle Starr is on PC/NA. Her story is on the Defiance RP Forum http://defiancerpforum.freeforums.net/ & Belle Starr Short Stories on Defiance Data! It's a FUN read! If you see her patrolling the highways and byways of Paradise in her white Challenger, say howdy!

  2. #12
    Member Kuroro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Argentina
    Posts
    3,338
    no...no...i told you why i dont play pvp in group.and i dont want a 1 vs 1 pvp,i want a 3 vs 3,6 vs 6,12 vs 12,16 vs 16,as it should be,not the actual 7 vs 2 or 15 vs 6 matches
    Danchou - mdarkraciel

  3. #13
    Member Mrdr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,214
    Quote Originally Posted by Kuroro View Post
    no...no...i told you why i dont play pvp in group.and i dont want a 1 vs 1 pvp,i want a 3 vs 3,6 vs 6,12 vs 12,16 vs 16,as it should be,not the actual 7 vs 2 or 15 vs 6 matches
    In that case, don't disable groups, make it so if 4 people are grouped and enter pvp then pvp will not start until at least 4 other people attempt to join on the opposite team. Kinda like how you have to wait to queue up in a coop.
    PS3 NA

  4. #14
    Member WhiteStrike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    [2050]PC-EU (Inactive)
    Posts
    3,763
    Quote Originally Posted by Mrdr View Post
    In that case, don't disable groups, make it so if 4 people are grouped and enter pvp then pvp will not start until at least 4 other people attempt to join on the opposite team. Kinda like how you have to wait to queue up in a coop.
    This exactly.
    Defiance is gone. Gamigo has been "not neglecting" the game for over a year, yet there's nothing new except for low effort arkfalls and bitshop items.
    I know it might be hard to quit a game you loved for years but you have to understand that it won't get better. Ever. If you like the game in it's current state, then sure, keep playing it. You're enjoying yourself after all. But if you aren't, don't hope for a better future for Defiance. Because it won't come.


    Spoiler:


  5. #15
    Member Kuroro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Argentina
    Posts
    3,338
    if a group of 4 joins then 4 more should join to start the match,being on the other team,so 2 or 3 persons join and,what if someone else joins with a full group?more people should be needed to start the match.i already tought what you said and no,it is not a solution,the solution is what i said : disable pvp for groups.
    Danchou - mdarkraciel

  6. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    PS3 EU
    Posts
    1,706
    Or just disable the ability to kill so everyone would be happy how does that sound to u

  7. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    poland - łódź
    Posts
    18
    But what if during, someone leaves game? Example: throws the system (critical), or he leaves the game (on a server PS3-EU, we have Guy, that leaves as his team loses). Then what? Others have to stand and wait for someone to join a incomplete group? Or maybe the game will end/restart ?
    Besides, it is often a problem to start a game 2x2 (obviously not counting Sundays, where on FY is eternally full server)...



    Quote Originally Posted by tarmim View Post
    Or just disable the ability to kill so everyone would be happy how does that sound to u
    I'll be glad, when you stop killing me

  8. #18
    Member Mrdr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,214
    Quote Originally Posted by Kuroro View Post
    if a group of 4 joins then 4 more should join to start the match,being on the other team,so 2 or 3 persons join and,what if someone else joins with a full group?more people should be needed to start the match.i already tought what you said and no,it is not a solution,the solution is what i said : disable pvp for groups.
    No. That's not a solution, it's a bigger problem.

    In the scenario you just mentioned where there are 4 in a group and 4 more join so it's 4 on 4 and another group of 4 tries to join, then the original 8 play while the other 4 wait until another 4 join.

    But if one or two quit, then pvp continues. There should be a difference value so that say there is always at least a ratio of 3:4 players or something. So say it's 16 vs 16 and 4 quit so it's now 12 vs 16 then game play continues. However, if it becomes 11 vs 16, then 4 from the group of 16 gets moved to another share that needs to even out the ratio of players, or that has a queue. The score of the people who moved could either get carried over to the new shard or not...doesn't really matter to me...whatever everyone else wants. Maybe even show a split score from each match.
    PS3 NA

  9. #19
    Member Kuroro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Argentina
    Posts
    3,338
    mrdr your idea is complicated but could work,still i prefer disabled pvp for groups so a match would start with 3 vs 3 always and people joining would be filling the teams like a tetris.matches start with 6 players,maybe it should be 8 and there should not be able to queue more than 8 to avoid numeric difference,to explain it: a group joins and then a few players join by themself or with a group of 2 or 3,but another group should not be able to join so that match should start with 4 vs 4.but i dont pvp anymore so idgaf to be honest...if there are matches of 7 vs 1 still,i dont care,because i wont be part of it
    Danchou - mdarkraciel

  10. #20
    Member Mrdr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,214
    Quote Originally Posted by Kuroro View Post
    but i dont pvp anymore so idgaf to be honest...if there are matches of 7 vs 1 still,i dont care,because i wont be part of it
    So...this entire conversation you started is utterly pointless for you. It was interesting though...got people talking about something you care nothing about.
    PS3 NA

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts