I'm on the other side of the fence. I've played both, but I prefer the direction of Firefall as a game and the how Red5 operates much more than how Defiance is being handled by Trion (can't comment freely on the game), even if Defiance is further along in development. I take issue with the assumption that this is some sort of FF defense brigade as suggested by that last bit. It's simply people who are unhappy with Defiance for one reason or another using a similar game as an alternative. They don't have to be unhappy about specific gameplay features, they can be unhappy about any number of things that are known about the game from the business model to the design decisions as to what type of game it is, to it's marketing. No different than people pointing to Path of Exile or Torchlight 2 when complaining about Diablo 3. FF stands on it's own feet well enough (well, it doesn't so much stand as jetpack through the air willy nilly)
I will agree though, the steam discussion forums are more or less useless. While I don't like the immediate jump to "TROLLS!" for having a differing opinion about the game, trying to have a discussion on the forums there is typically terrible, to the point where I don't get involved just so I don't have to deal with the constant back and forth that will go nowhere.




