+ Reply to Thread
Page 26 of 40 FirstFirst ... 16 24 25 26 27 28 36 ... LastLast
Results 251 to 260 of 396
  1. #251
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    926
    If the game had mechanics that promoted playing after you finish the story I would have easily said 8/10.

    The removal of codes from emergencies is still mystifying. So...the game got patched to have less reason to explore and by extension log in at all...hmm.
    stitch

  2. #252
    Senior Member RegularX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    636
    Quote Originally Posted by EdgeTW View Post
    Seems pretty straightforward. He thinks the PC version is superior to the PS3 version, citing performance issues and lackluster graphics. I haven't played it on the PS3, so I can't comment on either of those. Does the game look worse on the PS3 than the PC? Are their performance issues on the PS3 that don't exist on the PC? I find neither of those difficult to believe, honestly, and obviously that will impact the final score.

    The decimal portion of that score is supposed to represent where in a particular range a game falls. Is it a solid 5? Barely a 5? A really good 5? That kind of thing.



    LoL.. I'm not sure I understand this statement. It doesn't make me wonder that at all. It makes me think they went as far as reviewing a PC version AND a PS3 version. Why, what more are you reading into it?

    Edit: By the way, his review is not completely the same for both platforms. At the end he cites some differences:

    PC:

    At least, it's reasonably fun when it works smoothly. With rare exception, performance on PC has been pretty great since launch, largely due to the fact that the graphics don't really seem to be trying to do anything fancy. But there have been occasional lag spikes, which are more annoying than in a typical MMO because of the fact that this is a shooter, and I’ve had an annoying recurring issue where my shotgun fails to reload correctly. Plus whenever lots of players gather, half of them appear as the default male player model until eventually popping in their actual customized character. Shadow War typically has long queue times, too. Every MMO I’ve ever played has issues at launch, but Defiance would be just okay even if it were working perfectly. It can't afford hiccups like these.



    ...

    Respectable PvP combat goes a long way, but not far enough to make Defiance a recommendable experience.


    PS3:

    Lag has also been an issue. Plus whenever lots of players gather, half of them appear as the default male player model until eventually popping in their actual customized character. The Shadow War queue is considerably shorter here than on PC, but gameplay wise it’s performed poorly enough that it’s hard to play. Other issues like bugged quests screwed up sessions on PC, though it’s hard to say if they’ll also occur on the other versions since they’re seemingly random. Every MMO I’ve ever played has issues at launch, but Defiance would be just okay even if it were working perfectly. It can't afford hiccups like these.

    ...

    Respectable PvP combat goes a long way, but especially when the major performance issues rear their ugly head, it's not far enough to make Defiance a recommendable experience.


    Apparently the PS3 has performance issues. You'd have to ask a PS3 user about that (or just drop by the PS3 forum, I suppose). Outside of lag spikes and odd reload issues like that shotgun he was talking about (I've personally seen that a number of times), performance is one of the main things going for this game on the PC. Shame if it loses that on the PS3.
    The PS3 doesn't have any core performance issues. I've run into moments here and there but largely it is not a problem. Reading the PS3 review, I really don't know what game he was talking about. Everything in the verdict was like it was written on opposite day.

  3. #253
    OK, IGN gave the new SimCity a 7 out of 10 which should tell you how credible they are, they're absolutely insane if they really think Defiance is worse than that game.

  4. #254
    Senior Member RegularX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    636
    Quote Originally Posted by Technodude View Post
    Duke Nukem is a MMO now? i don't even understand why are you comparing a single player game with MMO.
    He's not. Have you even played Duken Nukem Forever? It was one of the worst games ever developed. No way it deserves a 5 or higher. 3/10 perhaps. He's not comparing anything, he is calling into question IGN's ability to rate things.

  5. #255
    Quote Originally Posted by EdgeTW View Post
    This is a common mistake players make when judging a review. How a reviewer feels about one game has absolutely nothing to do with how he or she feels about another. Everyone has different tastes, and what appeals to them or not may or may not appeal to you. How another game was reviewed is not important, what's important is the review of this game and his reasons behind his review (which are clearly laid out). If you disagree with those reasons, then you disagree with them. However, if you find his statements for this review to have merit, they aren't suddenly any less valid because another game received a score you disagree with.
    it's not a mistake. the man published an official review without actually exploring the full game. this is irresponsible journalism at it's best, fraud at it's worst.

  6. #256
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    926
    Quote Originally Posted by Dixa View Post
    it's not a mistake. the man published an official review without actually exploring the full game. this is irresponsible journalism at it's best, fraud at it's worst.
    Telling someone their opinion is irresponsible journalism is a tad harsh. What in that review is fraud exactly?
    stitch

  7. #257
    Quote Originally Posted by Derity View Post
    The game is recieving similar scores pretty much everywhere.

    I personally agree with IGN. I mean, what part of the review was completely wrong?
    i have less of an issue with his score, and more of an issue with how he went about it. anthony gallegos never fully plays a game he reviews.

    kevin van ord is the only decent mmo reviewer. he's over at gamespot. he ONLY does mmorpg's and rpgs for that mag, not cod or other stuff and he gets as close to end game as he humanly can before giving an opinion. his review of the secret world kept me from buying it at launch. i did buy it on sale a couple of months ago to try out for dirt cheap and his review ended up being spot on with every point he made.

    he's not perfect obviously, instead of being clinical and objective reviews HAVE to be opinionated as that is what our morally-bankrupt, intellectually-stunted society prefers.

  8. #258
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    674
    Quote Originally Posted by Dixa View Post
    it's not a mistake. the man published an official review without actually exploring the full game. this is irresponsible journalism at it's best, fraud at it's worst.
    Yet this is what every review does of every MMO game, why should Defiance get special treatment in comparison to the rest?

  9. #259
    its bull **** how the **** does cod get 9out10 its about who pays them the most to promote there game there rateings are false ign shouldnt be able to rate anything i give ign a 1 out 10

  10. #260
    Quote Originally Posted by jnt View Post
    Telling someone their opinion is irresponsible journalism is a tad harsh. What in that review is fraud exactly?
    the fact it exists

    what if roger ebert gave reviews of movies he only watched two-thirds of?

    now nobody is asking a website reviewer to get into end game raiding before publishing a review, but very few mmorpg's have end game raiding anymore. they DO have an end game of some sort, and that should be experienced first hand by any mmorpg reviewer BEFORE they publish a review.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts