The IGN review comes from a guy who gave Diablo a 9+ and didn't even play it all the way through and nobody takes Gamespot for more than a grain of salt after Kane & Lynch, the fail Global Agenda review which was pulled because the guy didn't play and the latest review that was pulled.
IGN loves everything mainstream. It doesn't matter that the last 4 Call of Duty's have sucked. According to IGN, they each redefine gaming every single year. You cannot and should not take them seriously. Defiance provides far more bang for your buck than some measly single-player romp like Bioshock.
Xbox 360 Gamertag: Xavier Horovitz
In-Game Name (NA Servers): Xavier Horovitz
My Defiance/Personal Blog: http://defiantanatomy.blogspot.com
Enjoy the content given to you.
Yes, it's there, and no, you probably haven't completed it all.
so you're basically trying to compare defiance(a game that they spent 105million on and took almost 5 years to make) to any of the games you just named??!! You're joking right? I would agrue that all the games you just named have more/better content than defiance. I think the game is a solid 6 and yeah i'm having fun playing it but even if there weren't bugs, and the game played as it should there just isn't that much there to keep the average game interested. The niche players/hardcore/fanboys can get 100 hours out of it which is cool, but the majority of us will get 30-40hrs max and will come back and check out some dlc. The fact that the game isn't that great has nothing to do with the fact that's it's an mmo in its infancy, other than combat it just ain't that fun.
I played Bioshock Infinite and it was truly wonderful. Well-crafted environment, and the plot made you want to protect Elizabeth. Her persona was very well-developed. The combat isn't its strongest point, but its story was just amazing to me. For a singleplayer game it was really fun. I managed to play through the game with minimum glitches. So a 9.7 score is warranted.
Defiance is also fun, but the amount of bugs and broken things make me feel like it wasn't given enough time for development and addressing of bugs, etc. Another notable thing is that your character is forever mute, and therefore it makes your character seem like an extra in a movie, only nodding when asked a question. So is a 5.5 warranted? I'd say at its present condition with all the bugs and glitches, maybe. I'd give it a 6 for the overall idea. But after they have patched everything, a re-review might give it a higher score.
Okay dude if you want to say that the game is fun that's one thing, but NO ONE CAN ARGUE ABOUT THE POOR LANDSCAPES. Everythings looks dead and the non of the buildings in san franciso are to scale(my character head is about where the first story roof would be). I said if before, I like the game, but you when you sit back and act like everything is great and nothings wrong with it............just makes you sound like a.........nah i won't go there.
To be honest. Why even compare MMO with a singleplayer? two really different gamestyles and uses different bases. And MMOs will always have more bugs than singleplayers so don't put defiance down just because of those. It's simply stupid to compare these 2 games.
WAZZAAAA?!?!?!?!?