Closed Thread
Page 3 of 28 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 13 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 272
  1. #21
    Aliens Colonial Marines showed trailers and 'live' gameplay demo's saying "This is 100% in-game footage". And also went on a campaign showing and talking about features that never where in the game.

    What has Trion advertised or showed thats not in the game now? Or makes you think never will be?

  2. #22
    Sueing? -insert american stereotype here- (Oh wait its already been done).

    What did they false advertise, damn the game is not finished till all the DLC comes out.
    + i haven't really seen anything from an ad that isn't really in the game.
    IpunchYoFace - EGO 2600
    Nom - 50

    The name is because all you bad men/women/aliens stole all my names i wanted xD

  3. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by DaMaJaDiZ View Post
    In the case of Gearbox pulling shyster crap like this again? The point is very valid. They won't be able to pull this nonsense with their next titles. Pitchford won't be walking around selling people on a lie. They won't be able to successfully sell pre-orders for another title that has impressions and review embargoes that only lift on release day. They definitely won't be able to thumb their noses at the customers they took for a ride and basically say to them, 'yeah we did that. So what?'
    It also sends a message to any publisher that some crap will not be tolerated, and losing face as a company isn't going to hurt as much as having legal action taken against them for bad business practices.
    Nor will any other company be able to provide footage from a beta product, discuss features in pre production, etc. We could just not buy from said company again, or we could cut all their pretty faces involement be damned.

  4. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by dim View Post
    More accurately I care more about the industry's survival and ability to produce good games than I do how much your sense of entitlement has been bruised.
    So it's more about what *you* want, than what I want. Because you don't need video games to live right? Just food, shelter, and water. Anything beyond that, is merely fluff. So no matter how much you claim your intentions are "better" than mine, it is still naturally selfish and self serving.

  5. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    200
    If there was a lawsuit, all of us would just end up paying for it in future games. Companies would have to have lawyers oversee all marketing which would just drive the costs up.

    As far as this potential lawsuit.....it is an MMO. Nothing was promised at release. As long as they implement their "promises" at some point then they should be fine.

  6. #26
    Senior Member DaMaJaDiZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    City of Angels, USA
    Posts
    771
    Quote Originally Posted by dim View Post
    Nor will any other company be able to provide footage from a beta product, discuss features in pre production, etc. We could just not buy from said company again, or we could cut all their pretty faces involement be damned.
    They can show any footage they want. They just have to be crystal clear where said footage and other impressions are from. The onus is on the user to decide what level of involvement they want in following a games progression, and when, if ever they decide to opt in and purchase.

  7. #27
    Senior Member DaMaJaDiZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    City of Angels, USA
    Posts
    771
    Quote Originally Posted by ewishki View Post
    If there was a lawsuit, all of us would just end up paying for it in future games. Companies would have to have lawyers oversee all marketing which would just drive the costs up.

    They already do have lawyers for just that purpose.

  8. #28
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Saitama, Japan
    Posts
    8
    The only thing they said in a video that isn't in game is weather effects.
    But sueing because it's not raining is laughable to say the least.
    Things that aren't working will be fixed (I hope).
    People complaining about content need to understand that as advertised, the game has a tie in with the tv show. Content releasing dates are probably already in place, giving us anything before said dates would spoil the show.

  9. #29
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    18
    The Xbox.com details for it are clearly not pictures of the Xbox game. Is it worth suing for? No. Avoiding Trion in the future? Yes.

    Good game, but a nauseating business model. How many games really need to charge this kind of money AFTER nailing you for $60? Not many, thankfully.

  10. #30
    Senior Member Chemikz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Newcastle, UK
    Posts
    391
    Quote Originally Posted by New Gnu View Post
    The Xbox.com details for it are clearly not pictures of the Xbox game. Is it worth suing for? No. Avoiding Trion in the future? Yes.

    Good game, but a nauseating business model. How many games really need to charge this kind of money AFTER nailing you for $60? Not many, thankfully.
    Welcome to the MMO market my friend. The land of subscriptions, cash shops and DLC's! Virtual drugs, quite clever.
    Xbox360 Gamertag Europe: Chemikz
    In-Game Name: Ardim Lazarus
    Clan Name: Exiled

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts