If you want new content you gotta pay for it.

[nosworc]

this game should never have been launched on consoles EVER. Its like cutting a leg off and then trying to run a marathon, awkward.
So sad to see PC crippled so consoles can whine about the game

Erm, it would still be the same no content game if it was a PC exclusive so not quite sure what you mean by this.

[Schwa]

Erm, it would still be the same no content game if it was a PC exclusive so not quite sure what you mean by this.

Would it? If the developers only needed to focus on one system, they wouldn't have needed to divert resources into the systems with a hard-upper-end of resources.

See also: Rain.
See also: Cloth simulation (long coats).
See also: Transparency on vehicles (interiors modeled, windows now either silvered or replaced with armor)

It stands to reason if they could implement the things they obviously intended to implement, they could've had more time to implement other things. Or at least bring quality up to a standard befitting their name.

[Rasczak]

this game should never have been launched on consoles EVER. Its like cutting a leg off and then trying to run a marathon, awkward.
So sad to see PC crippled so consoles can whine about the game

Having seen this same issue in DC Universe Online, I would have to concur.

[KOLZ]

Erm, it would still be the same no content game if it was a PC exclusive so not quite sure what you mean by this.

Just a pc elitist with his head up his *** cause of higher resolution.

[Arsenic_Touch]

Erm, it would still be the same no content game if it was a PC exclusive so not quite sure what you mean by this.

The content may be the same, the UI and graphics and other things (which is what he was talking about) would not have been crippled because they would've designed it from a pc stand point and not a console stand point.

[KOLZ]

The content may be the same, the UI and graphics and other things (which is what he was talking about) would not have been crippled because they would've designed it from a pc stand point and not a console stand point.

yes pc elitist because mmo's all look like crysis3 right? lol..

[Schwa]

The content may be the same, the UI and graphics and other things (which is what he was talking about) would not have been crippled because they would've designed it from a pc stand point and not a console stand point.

Not to mention if QA only needed to focus on one system, they wouldn't be split three ways.

We would've had Freight Yard in two attempts rather than five! Everybody party!

[nosworc]

Would it? If the developers only needed to focus on one system, they wouldn't have needed to divert resources into the systems with a hard-upper-end of resources.

See also: Rain.
See also: Cloth simulation (long coats).
See also: Transparency on vehicles (interiors modeled, windows now either silvered or replaced with armor)

It stands to reason if they could implement the things they obviously intended to implement, they could've had more time to implement other things. Or at least bring quality up to a standard befitting their name.

The things you mentioned, yes i agree just working on one platform those probably would have been implemented but my point really was i still think the game as it is now, ie no real content to do after story missions are completed, would more or less be the same.

[JonDav]

yep pretty much. I paid you didnt you cant use my shiny new toy, but you can see me use it. That is how MMO content is supposed to work thats how they get you to buy. Its also how I get to feel special for a whole day till you cave and spend the $10.

Excellent logic. Drive away the community so you can "show off your shiny new toy" to........nobody. But hey, as long as you can feel like a pre-teen showing off his first facial whisker to the game's remaining population (bandits, mutants, dark matter, etc) all is good I guess.

[BrassRazoo]

I'm sure from a selling point the Publishers would disagree with it only being on one platform.