2 skeptical prejudgments about the DLC. Listen up Devs!

[Finish the Fight]

typical pvp ruins pve rant.

did you ever stop to think that shotguns were to strong in pve as well? because they were. anyone with common sense would know that Trion looked at both pvp AND pve before making the changes to shotguns.

It’s typical because it a common criticism.

[Cavadus]

There are something like a thousand missions in the game (from what I’ve read).

Whatever you're reading is unbelievably incorrect. If you combined the main storyline missions, side missions, and co-op maps the game is probably approximating 80-100 "missions."

And that's being generous.

You should probably play the game before you decide that we're all wrong.

[Slay]

There are something like a thousand missions in the game (from what I’ve read). For repeatable content there are hotshots, rampages, time trials, emergencies and Co-ops besides Arkfalls (and soon to be Sieges). There are also daily contracts. Just because you focus on PVP doesn’t mean it’s a PVP centric game.

1 main story line. (Around 20 missions that encompass the main story)
90 or so very boring grindy side missions.


It isn't a PvP centric came at all don't get me wrong, but by adding a lack of new content and no DLC and nothing todo after the main story people are resorting to PvP to find their fun as I do. Nothing else interests me in the game and that is PERFECTLY FINE, that is my opinion and I will keep my opinion.

[Finish the Fight]

I've played the story twice already, I don't know why you just chose to ignore me saying that. There's nothing left to do after PvE besides PvP, and that's what I'm doing. I'm obviously not going to play it a 3rd time because that's seriously boring. I'd rather do PvP, stop telling me what I can and can't play. You sound like a control freak the way you tell me i'm wrong because I play PvP,



Stick to your opinion and atleast respect other's views. I also said the develops can more than easily change enemy health and skill levels to compensate PvP balancing, and that would even be better if they just fixed weapon balance in the long run.

I’m not ignoring the fact you’ve played the story twice and I haven’t suggested you SHOULD be playing it again. In fact if you actually read my comment it says you are welcome to play or not play what you want. Sounds like a control freak to me /sarcasm. It’s just irrelevant to balancing an entire game for the sake of one aspect of it. (and a small one at that)

You second comment doesn’t make much sense. How I’m I not sticking to my opinion or disrespecting your view any more than you are mine? This bit sounds more like you just don’t want to hear someone disagree with you.

[Hope499]

I've played the story twice already, I don't know why you just chose to ignore me saying that. There's nothing left to do after PvE besides PvP, and that's what I'm doing. I'm obviously not going to play it a 3rd time because that's seriously boring. I'd rather do PvP, stop telling me what I can and can't play. You sound like a control freak the way you tell me i'm wrong because I play PvP,



Stick to your opinion and atleast respect other's views. I also said the develops can more than easily change enemy health and skill levels to compensate PvP balancing, and that would even be better if they just fixed weapon balance in the long run.

I fully agree with this 100% (not the case with me, but I respect it)

I still have fun in PvE, but if I didn't? Yea of course I would play PvP exclusively. The shotguns were TOO good, I have no prob with the nerf (hate it, but understand it)

Lets face it, a lot of the weapons could be taken down a peg, and we would still be fine in PvE.

The man don't like PvE anymore, it bores him and he plays PvP...

And there is no focus, this is a unique game in that the PvP and PvE are about the same, depending on what you enjoy more.

For him, PvP is the main part, for you its PvE..

Stop hatin!!!

[Schwa]

Skeptical? Pah.

Skeptical is what I feel when someone suggests they'll be able to deliver a major clientside patch without 8+ hours of downtime.

All signs up until now point to "not capable."

[Slay]

I’m not ignoring the fact you’ve played the story twice and I haven’t suggested you SHOULD be playing it again. In fact if you actually read my comment it says you are welcome to play or not play what you want. Sounds like a control freak to me /sarcasm. It’s just irrelevant to balancing an entire game for the sake of one aspect of it. (and a small one at that)

You second comment doesn’t make much sense. How I’m I not sticking to my opinion or disrespecting your view any more than you are mine? This bit sounds more like you just don’t want to hear someone disagree with you.

You said that i'm wrong for wanting to play PvP only.
Tons of people play the game only for PvP because there is no more PvE content, obviously it's a small aspect but it's the small aspect everyone plays and enjoys for the most part. They're even expanding on the PvP in the DLC with yet another map, dueling, etc. It's not a small aspect, the maps and PvP are played and encouraged by contracts.

[Finish the Fight]

Whatever you're reading is unbelievably incorrect. If you combined the main storyline missions, side missions, and co-op maps the game is probably approximating 80-100 "missions."

And that's being generous.

You should probably play the game before you decide that we're all wrong.

Fair enough. I haven’t bothered to count the missions myself and I did note it was just something I’ve read.. But you ignored the reset of the comment about all the repeatable content..convenient.

Your second comment is laughable. You resort to insulting me (after ignoring inconvenient facts about content) and have the ganges to say ‘we’re all" as if despite numerous threads on the subject I’m the only one who feels PVP shouldn’t dictate balancing issues for the entire game. At least Slay thought out his responses.

[Finish the Fight]

I fully agree with this 100% (not the case with me, but I respect it)

I still have fun in PvE, but if I didn't? Yea of course I would play PvP exclusively. The shotguns were TOO good, I have no prob with the nerf (hate it, but understand it)

Lets face it, a lot of the weapons could be taken down a peg, and we would still be fine in PvE.

The man don't like PvE anymore, it bores him and he plays PvP...

And there is no focus, this is a unique game in that the PvP and PvE are about the same, depending on what you enjoy more.

For him, PvP is the main part, for you its PvE..

Stop hatin!!!

Actaully I fully play both. I simply don't believe pvp should negatively impact PvE because of PvP centric players.

[marshy]

Fair enough. I haven’t bothered to count the missions myself and I did note it was just something I’ve read.. But you ignored the reset of the comment about all the repeatable content..convenient.

Your second comment is laughable. You resort to insulting me (after ignoring inconvenient facts about content) and have the ganges to say ‘we’re all" as if despite numerous threads on the subject I’m the only one who feels PVP shouldn’t dictate balancing issues for the entire game. At least Slay thought out his responses.

What's up 40